<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Democratic View of Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/</link>
	<description>Semper Vigilo, Semper Libero !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bull</title>
		<link>http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-20135</link>
		<dc:creator>Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebullspeaks.com/archives/2007/01/29/the-democratic-view-of-life/#comment-20135</guid>
		<description>Curious, have you been in a closet since January 22, 1973? (Roe vs. Wade)

Pro-Life = folks that see abortion as murder.

Pro-Choice = folks that see abortion as a woman&#039;s choice and not murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right:10px; display:block; width:80px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://thebullspeaks.com/'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/e69d4937a96a7ad8cc1caa936520a27b?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fthebullspeaks.com%2Fimages%2Fmysteryman.jpeg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=R' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></a></span>Curious, have you been in a closet since January 22, 1973? (Roe vs. Wade)</p>
<p>Pro-Life = folks that see abortion as murder.</p>
<p>Pro-Choice = folks that see abortion as a woman&#8217;s choice and not murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious</title>
		<link>http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-20079</link>
		<dc:creator>curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebullspeaks.com/archives/2007/01/29/the-democratic-view-of-life/#comment-20079</guid>
		<description>what do &quot;pro-lfe&quot; and &quot;pro-choice&quot; mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right:10px; display:block; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/72d3a5acb8a6f27bdf6cd8d264fd0f34?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fthebullspeaks.com%2Fimages%2Fmysteryman.jpeg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=R' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></span>what do &#8220;pro-lfe&#8221; and &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malnurtured Snay</title>
		<link>http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-19234</link>
		<dc:creator>Malnurtured Snay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebullspeaks.com/archives/2007/01/29/the-democratic-view-of-life/#comment-19234</guid>
		<description>Hey, Bull,

I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d read too much into Murphy&#039;s statement -- the right uses &quot;pro-life&quot; to describe its position the same way the left uses &quot;pro-choice&quot; to describe its own.  It isn&#039;t like he just coined the term.  

The problem I have with the term &quot;pro-life&quot; is that it makes it seem as if being &quot;pro-choice&quot; is &quot;anti-life&quot; (which I think is a misnomer).  Does being &quot;pro-life&quot; make someone &quot;anti-choice&quot;?  I&#039;m &quot;pro-choice&quot; for a variety of reasons, but two primary reasons are because a.) politically, I don&#039;t think the government has the authority to tell a person what they can or cannot do to their bodies, b.) and personally, as a man, I&#039;ll never be in the position of having an unwanted pregnancy in my body, and don&#039;t believe I or anyone else has the right to force someone to carry that pregnancy to term.   

I&#039;m absolutely in favor of programs -- private or government based -- to encourage couples faced with an unwanted pregnancy to look at adoption as a preferably option to abortion; I&#039;m in favor of sex-education so that individuals experimenting with sex will have the knowledge and opportunity to do so in a safe manner; I&#039;m not opposed to encouraging abstinence, but I don&#039;t think encouraging abstinence and hoping people won&#039;t have sex is ridiculous - encouraging abstinence should be a part of a program of sexual education, &quot;Put the condom on the bannana.  By the way, don&#039;t have sex until you&#039;re at least thirty.&quot;  

Furthermore, I think Murphy is right about Giuliani.  Giuliani is a great crossover candidate ... in certain states: he&#039;s a moderate Republican who is receptive to gay rights and pro-choice.  A lot of blue-staters and a lot of die-hard Democratic voters would fall into his camp.  For those same reasons, a lot of red-staters and die-hard members of the Religious Right would stay as far away as possible.  While I don&#039;t think being pro-choice is quite the vote killer in certain Republican-voting communities (primarily, the libertarian ones), I think he&#039;d have a really tough time getting the Republican base behind him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right:10px; display:block; width:80px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.malnurturedsnay.net'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9c1003094e718ab13624464dea66f81d?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fthebullspeaks.com%2Fimages%2Fmysteryman.jpeg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=R' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></a></span>Hey, Bull,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d read too much into Murphy&#8217;s statement &#8212; the right uses &#8220;pro-life&#8221; to describe its position the same way the left uses &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; to describe its own.  It isn&#8217;t like he just coined the term.  </p>
<p>The problem I have with the term &#8220;pro-life&#8221; is that it makes it seem as if being &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; is &#8220;anti-life&#8221; (which I think is a misnomer).  Does being &#8220;pro-life&#8221; make someone &#8220;anti-choice&#8221;?  I&#8217;m &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; for a variety of reasons, but two primary reasons are because a.) politically, I don&#8217;t think the government has the authority to tell a person what they can or cannot do to their bodies, b.) and personally, as a man, I&#8217;ll never be in the position of having an unwanted pregnancy in my body, and don&#8217;t believe I or anyone else has the right to force someone to carry that pregnancy to term.   </p>
<p>I&#8217;m absolutely in favor of programs &#8212; private or government based &#8212; to encourage couples faced with an unwanted pregnancy to look at adoption as a preferably option to abortion; I&#8217;m in favor of sex-education so that individuals experimenting with sex will have the knowledge and opportunity to do so in a safe manner; I&#8217;m not opposed to encouraging abstinence, but I don&#8217;t think encouraging abstinence and hoping people won&#8217;t have sex is ridiculous &#8211; encouraging abstinence should be a part of a program of sexual education, &#8220;Put the condom on the bannana.  By the way, don&#8217;t have sex until you&#8217;re at least thirty.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Furthermore, I think Murphy is right about Giuliani.  Giuliani is a great crossover candidate &#8230; in certain states: he&#8217;s a moderate Republican who is receptive to gay rights and pro-choice.  A lot of blue-staters and a lot of die-hard Democratic voters would fall into his camp.  For those same reasons, a lot of red-staters and die-hard members of the Religious Right would stay as far away as possible.  While I don&#8217;t think being pro-choice is quite the vote killer in certain Republican-voting communities (primarily, the libertarian ones), I think he&#8217;d have a really tough time getting the Republican base behind him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrontBurner</title>
		<link>http://thebullspeaks.com/2007/01/the-democratic-view-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-18751</link>
		<dc:creator>FrontBurner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebullspeaks.com/archives/2007/01/29/the-democratic-view-of-life/#comment-18751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Right On Bull!...&lt;/strong&gt;

An eye-opener from The Bull Speaks. I concur!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Right On Bull!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An eye-opener from The Bull Speaks. I concur!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
